Customised CNC upgrade simplifies railcar axle grinding

Stadler021

Image by wirtschaftsteiermark
Stadler CNC Technik Detuschfeistritz Steiermark Wirtschaft Buchmann SFG Styria Austria Technologie Innovation technology innovation Metall Verarbeitung

Dieses Bild kann unter Angabe der Quelle verwendet werden
www.wirtschaft.steiermark.at
www.sfg.at

Customised CNC upgrade simplifies railcar axle grinding
A comprehensive upgrade of classic higher energy centreless grinding machine tools is helping a major railcar axle manufacturer to drastically simplify precision grinding operations on axle forgings. A crucial element of the project – which has been managed by&nbsp…
Study more on Moneycontrol.com

Mastercam integrates Adveon Tool Library
Fair Lawn, New Jersey / Tolland, Connecticut – CNC Software program Inc. and Sandvik Coromant officials have announced that they will be operating with each other to integrate the Adveon Tool Library with Mastercam. Adveon will support Mastercam users to further boost&nbsp…
Read a lot more on Today’s Health-related Developments

5-Axis Grinder Plus Alternatives Add Up to Significantly A lot more
Recently, Schütte introduced its 325linear machine, a five-axis CNC grinder with extended X- and Y-axis movement, plus two auxiliary slides for workpiece clamping and improved grinding wheel guidance over the whole machining envelope. Micro tools, gun&nbsp…
Study a lot more on American Machinist

Good Precision Turned Elements Suppliers pictures

Some cool precision turned elements suppliers pictures:

Montblanc Boutique 151 Bloor Street West Toronto Ontario

Image by antefixus21
Nicholas Rieussec Chronograph.

Chronograph – Nicholas Rieussec time piece.

Swiss developed.

Montblanc Nicolas Rieussec Chronograph Automatic Watch Overview
WRIST TIME Critiques
20 COMMENTSJANUARY 3, 2011 BY ARIEL ADAMS

This watch overview is going to be a bit distinct than how I typically do them. Why? Just because shortly ahead of the overview I was genuinely capable to verify out the manufacture creating the movements of this watch. That expertise provided me some particular insight that permitted me to recognize this timepiece far more.
I know there is a lot of speak on the &ampquotmanufacture&ampquot movement. In reality, a recent panel discussion I had with fellow watch specialist journalists allowed me to comprehend that there is no strict definition of &ampquotwatch manufacture&ampquot or &ampquotmanufacture movement.&ampquot This definitional ambiguity hurts my capability to explain factors properly, but let it be stated that Montblanc tends to make the movement in each and each of the Nicolas Rieussec watches themselves. Of course there is some help from suppliers, but this is about as &ampquotin-property&ampquot a job as most folks want it to be. My understanding is that the elements of the movements are created at the Valfleurier facility in Buttes Switzerland. The pieces are then sent to Montblanc Le Locle for assembly and testing.

What fascinated me most about the Montblanc manufacture in Le Locle Switzerland was just how modern day day it was. I imply it is precise that numerous watch manufactures really feel like you are in some combo of a hospital and science lab, but the machinery accessible to the watch makers at the Le Locle facility was impressive. I have a larger feature length report on this subject that will come out speedily – but in fast, when it comes to the Nicolas Rieussec line of timepieces, Montblanc relies on a clever environment that combines the human strategy of watch makers with the precision assist of machines.

A few instance of this synergy in between man (or lady) and machine? Here are two. 1 of the pictures here is of a machine that robotically applies lubricant to designated spots in a watch. Such lubricant ought to be precisely applied with an precise amount. The a lot much more frequently applied the far greater. Even though a human assembles the movement, a robot is utilized to apply the lubricant far much better and with far more precision in terms of quantity than any human can do often. One much more instance is a machine that makes it attainable for a watch maker to adjust the screws on a balance wheel and test the accuracy of the price tag in true time. Fundamentally the machine combines a magnifier, laptop controlled screw driver, and a watch movement rate tester in 1. While it is operated by a individual, the machine makes it simple to adjust a normal weighted balance wheel to its most precise weight distribution in the escapement assembly.

A single of my favourite images here that illustrates the culture of the manufacture is the image of the watch tools with the computer mouse. If you appear closely you are going to also notice the presence of a Montblanc pen. Each function station gives watchmakers a computer terminal as efficiently as watch generating tools. Though I have noticed this prior to, it undoubtedly is not frequent.

With their movements all created in Switzerland by Montblanc, the Nicolas Rieussec collection at present consists of a couple of watches. My main concentrate here is on the Automatic Chronograph that also has a GMT and date complication (that I tested). The movement is identified as the R200. The two manually wound variants (with slightly diverse functions) are the R100, R110, and R120 (a restricted edition that used a silicium escapement). I am not going to go overboard with technical details, but the movements represent an fascinating medium amongst the ultra-higher finish, and mass manufactured pieces.

The R200 has a lot of impressive characteristics on paper. Notable to the watch nerd is that it has a column wheel primarily primarily based chronograph that utilizes a vertical clutch. These characteristics offer you considerably much more durability and precision when making use of the chronograph. There are really handful of European chronographs that function each of these functions. I ought to also note that some of Seiko’s larger-finish chronograph movements also function column wheels and vertical clutches, as do pieces by brands such as Patek Philippe and (the former) Daniel Roth. Why all the concentrate on the chronograph? Effectively that is the new signature complication of Montblanc. The brand latched on to the complication for good explanation (as properly as to Mr. Nicolas Rieussec). &ampquotChronograph&ampquot actually implies &ampquottime writer.&ampquot What is Montblanc recognized for? Yes, producing pens. Sound too wonderful to be precise to have a watch in your collection that is a &ampquottime writer?&ampquot So the emphasis on this complication make excellent sense. Nicolas Rieussec is guy credited with &ampquotinventing the chronograph.&ampquot Montblanc adopted him.

A despite the fact that ago Rieussec developed a device that appears like an early seismograph. It was a clock with a cease and commence function that pulled a disc of paper along a smaller sized writing tip. This device was the really first identified &ampquotchronograph.&ampquot It was meant to measure time in horse races and really &ampquotwrote.&ampquot The appear of the chronograph on the watch is taken from this early device. Montblanc keeps replicas of them about the manufacture for inspiration. Each and every Nicolas Rieussec watch uses two discs that move along stationary hands to show the chronograph time (up to 30 minutes). These are also monopusher chronographs that use a single pusher to cycle through &ampquotstart, cease, and reset&ampquot functions for the chronograph. The pusher is enormous, straightforward to find, and placed at the five o’clock position on the watch. Don’t miss the exposed synthetic palette rubies exposed on the leading of the chronograph dials.

This chronograph style is the signature look of the Nicolas Rieussec collection. The time is displayed on an off-centered dial at the prime of the face. While tiny, Montblanc really helped that dial standout and be legible. It utilizes that fancy looking font that you will uncover on most Montblanc Star watches. I genuinely do adore that font.

On the manually-wound versions of the Nicolas Rieussec, the time dial has a third hand employed for the date. On the automatic, the third had is GMT hand. Functioning just like you would assume, the principal time hour hand can be independently adjusted to alter the time when moving by indicates of time zones when traveling. To the left of the dial is a day/evening indicator linked to the GMT hand. This valuable complication help you know if it is day or evening on your second timezone supplied that it is displayed on the 12, versus 24 hour scale. Who’d a even although this would turn out to be such a helpful travel watch? Both time zones share the minute hand. I was normally impressed by the GMT functionality of the watch and feels that the R200 movement’s use of the third hand is considerably better than having it be a date indicator.

Whilst the left of the dial has the day/evening indicator, the correct has a date wheel. For symmetry Montblanc utilizes a window of a associated shape, but I don’t substantially care for &ampquotopen&ampquot date windows. It also does not appear spectacular with the upper and lowered date becoming partially beneath the dial – though that does really aid with maintaining your concentrate on the actual date. While the windows that flank the time dial appear good, I have a feeling Montblanc may function to revise or polish the style in future generations of the watch.

Coming in a couple of tones, the dial of the Montblanc Nicolas Rieussec is an intriguing creature. It took me a even though to warm up to it, but I am enjoying the style. Although completely numerous than other collection Montblanc provides, the Nicolas Rieussec does share the brand’s DNA nicely. Of course the crown has that lovely white Montblanc star, and the case is incredibly considerably inspired by the Star collection. To make visual depth, the power component of the dial is partially &ampquoteclipsed&ampquot by a plate of Geneva stripe polished metal – plus, the dial seems to be developed up of a couple of layers. The chronograph dials are covered with a sort of want-bone like bridge that utilizes blued steel screws (blued steel is also utilized for some of the hands). This is a nice element, but I had a single suggestion for Montblanc. Even although this might effectively enhance the price a bit, I feel it would be actually welcome. The bridge is created from stamped steel. What if it could be designed from milled and hand-polished steel? It would give a great visual cue and reminder that this is a hand-assembled watch. Perhaps in the future.

Let’s go to the R200 movement once more. It is an automatic version of the R100 with a handful of addition complications (as described above). You can see the rotor placed more than the movement, with the modest Montblanc star shaped hole that is produced to pass correct more than the column wheel opening window. The movement has two mainspring barrels for a energy reserve of 72 hours. The movement operates at 28,800bmp and can be adjusted to be really correct. I saw a movement at the manufacture that was adjusted to operate within considerably less than a single second of deviation a day. I enjoy that the movement combines modern day technologies and traditionalism. Like I stated, it utilizes a totally free-weighted balance spring and column wheel, enjoys assists from hugely sophisticated machinery in its assembly and manufacture.

The Nicolas Rieussec watch case is 43mm wide and 14.8mm tall. It is not a tiny watch, but it does wear like a medium 1. Its height is visually lowered by the hugely curved lugs. Front and rear crystal are sapphire (with the front crystal getting double AR coating), though it is water resistant to 30 meters.

Montblanc has assured me that their dedication to the Nicolas Rieussec collection is intense. The collection will obtain far far more focus in the future, which is aided by the reality that the watch is a advertising and advertising great final results. A single of the motives for this is the pricing. Although the watches are not low price they are a lot more inexpensive that you’d anticipate. The pieces come in gold, platinum, and steel. The gold models are in the ,000 variety. Not low expense, but Montblanc is not asking for ,000. In fact, their platinum version is about ,000 – which in the luxury marketplace spot is not that significantly for a platinum watch. In steel the watch retails for about ,200. It comes in a steel bracelet or an alligator strap (black or brown). I am told that quickly Montblanc will generate a brand new metal bracelet for the Nicolas Rieussec collection.

Common these are enjoyable watches. The Montblanc identity is a significant great, and I appreciate the visual style and functionality of the R200 movement. Even even though distinctive in its appears, this is an straightforward watch to put on day-to-day. Montblanc is not creating a mere collector’s piece correct here. Created to avert boredom but sustain utility the Nicolas Rieussec watch collection is intended for all varieties of watch lovers to worn each and every day.

Lastest Wire Edm Solutions News

Prototype to Production: NPI/Medical Is Quick-Turn Artist
Service encompasses NPI/Healthcare&#39s eagerness to help low-volume production, often for startup businesses, and its wide variety of capabilities to help varied customer demands. As president David Kelly puts it, “When a customer asks whether we have a …
Study far more on Plastics Technologies

Sinker EDM Machines balance energy, speed, and precision.
December 22, 2015 – Equipped with Hyper and SuperSpark IV technologies, models EDNC10, EDNC15, and EDNC20 provide X/Y/Z travels from 39.4 x 23.six x 19.7 in. to 78.7 x 27.6 x 23.six in. and max perform tank loads from 59.1 x 43.3 x 19.7 in. to 110.2 x 63. x&nbsp…
Read a lot more on ThomasNet News (press release) (weblog)

GF Machining Showcases New EDM Series Among Medical Machining Advancements at
LINCOLNSHIRE, Ill. – GF Machining Options will demonstrate the higher efficiency and higher productivity of its new AgieCharmilles Cut E (efficiency) 350 as part of the Reduce E Series of wire EDMs at MDM 2016 on February 9-11 at the Anaheim Convention …
Read far more on ThomasNet News (press release) (blog)

A Swiss-Sort Turning Point

A Swiss-Kind Turning Point
Even though the shop already had CNC lathes on the floor, they have been two-axis machines at most. “You would finish your turning and shut off the machine,” Mr. Slabe recalls, “and if the part needed milling you would take it to a VMC or an HMC. But the Swiss&nbsp…
Read more on Modern day Machine Shop

BobCAM for SOLIDWORKS v5 Released
It lets the user add some flair to CNC-manufactured components by taking photos or drawings and turning them into relief models or vectorized geometry. These can then be machined with CNC mill, router, waterjet, laser and burning machines. This add-on …
Study a lot more on ENGINEERING.com

herzog &amp de meuron compiles a collection of design objects
in the procedure of finishing accalimed creating projects about the globe, swiss architectural firm herzog &amp de meuron has developed a increasing quantity of design objects. these pieces — which incorporate lamps, stools, and even coathangers — have now been&nbsp…
Study far more on Designboom

Nice Surface Grinding Manufacturer photos

Check out these surface grinding manufacturer images:

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center: Space Shuttle Enterprise in the James McDonnell Space Hangar

Image by Chris Devers
See more photos of this, and the Wikipedia article.

Details, quoting from Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum | Space Shuttle Enterprise:

Manufacturer:
Rockwell International Corporation

Country of Origin:
United States of America

Dimensions:
Overall: 57 ft. tall x 122 ft. long x 78 ft. wing span, 150,000 lb.
(1737.36 x 3718.57 x 2377.44cm, 68039.6kg)

Materials:
Aluminum airframe and body with some fiberglass features; payload bay doors are graphite epoxy composite; thermal tiles are simulated (polyurethane foam) except for test samples of actual tiles and thermal blankets.

The first Space Shuttle orbiter, "Enterprise," is a full-scale test vehicle used for flights in the atmosphere and tests on the ground; it is not equipped for spaceflight. Although the airframe and flight control elements are like those of the Shuttles flown in space, this vehicle has no propulsion system and only simulated thermal tiles because these features were not needed for atmospheric and ground tests. "Enterprise" was rolled out at Rockwell International’s assembly facility in Palmdale, California, in 1976. In 1977, it entered service for a nine-month-long approach-and-landing test flight program. Thereafter it was used for vibration tests and fit checks at NASA centers, and it also appeared in the 1983 Paris Air Show and the 1984 World’s Fair in New Orleans. In 1985, NASA transferred "Enterprise" to the Smithsonian Institution’s National Air and Space Museum.

Transferred from National Aeronautics and Space Administration

• • •

Quoting from Wikipedia | Space Shuttle Enterprise:

The Space Shuttle Enterprise (NASA Orbiter Vehicle Designation: OV-101) was the first Space Shuttle orbiter. It was built for NASA as part of the Space Shuttle program to perform test flights in the atmosphere. It was constructed without engines or a functional heat shield, and was therefore not capable of spaceflight.

Originally, Enterprise had been intended to be refitted for orbital flight, which would have made it the second space shuttle to fly after Columbia. However, during the construction of Columbia, details of the final design changed, particularly with regard to the weight of the fuselage and wings. Refitting Enterprise for spaceflight would have involved dismantling the orbiter and returning the sections to subcontractors across the country. As this was an expensive proposition, it was determined to be less costly to build Challenger around a body frame (STA-099) that had been created as a test article. Similarly, Enterprise was considered for refit to replace Challenger after the latter was destroyed, but Endeavour was built from structural spares instead.

Service

Construction began on the first orbiter on June 4, 1974. Designated OV-101, it was originally planned to be named Constitution and unveiled on Constitution Day, September 17, 1976. A write-in campaign by Trekkies to President Gerald Ford asked that the orbiter be named after the Starship Enterprise, featured on the television show Star Trek. Although Ford did not mention the campaign, the president—who during World War II had served on the aircraft carrier USS Monterey (CVL-26) that served with USS Enterprise (CV-6)—said that he was "partial to the name" and overrode NASA officials.

The design of OV-101 was not the same as that planned for OV-102, the first flight model; the tail was constructed differently, and it did not have the interfaces to mount OMS pods. A large number of subsystems—ranging from main engines to radar equipment—were not installed on this vehicle, but the capacity to add them in the future was retained. Instead of a thermal protection system, its surface was primarily fiberglass.

In mid-1976, the orbiter was used for ground vibration tests, allowing engineers to compare data from an actual flight vehicle with theoretical models.

On September 17, 1976, Enterprise was rolled out of Rockwell’s plant at Palmdale, California. In recognition of its fictional namesake, Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry and most of the principal cast of the original series of Star Trek were on hand at the dedication ceremony.

Approach and landing tests (ALT)

Main article: Approach and Landing Tests

On January 31, 1977, it was taken by road to Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards Air Force Base, to begin operational testing.

While at NASA Dryden, Enterprise was used by NASA for a variety of ground and flight tests intended to validate aspects of the shuttle program. The initial nine-month testing period was referred to by the acronym ALT, for "Approach and Landing Test". These tests included a maiden "flight" on February 18, 1977 atop a Boeing 747 Shuttle Carrier Aircraft (SCA) to measure structural loads and ground handling and braking characteristics of the mated system. Ground tests of all orbiter subsystems were carried out to verify functionality prior to atmospheric flight.

The mated Enterprise/SCA combination was then subjected to five test flights with Enterprise unmanned and unactivated. The purpose of these test flights was to measure the flight characteristics of the mated combination. These tests were followed with three test flights with Enterprise manned to test the shuttle flight control systems.

Enterprise underwent five free flights where the craft separated from the SCA and was landed under astronaut control. These tests verified the flight characteristics of the orbiter design and were carried out under several aerodynamic and weight configurations. On the fifth and final glider flight, pilot-induced oscillation problems were revealed, which had to be addressed before the first orbital launch occurred.

On August 12, 1977, the space shuttle Enterprise flew on its own for the first time.

Preparation for STS-1

Following the ALT program, Enterprise was ferried among several NASA facilities to configure the craft for vibration testing. In June 1979, it was mated with an external tank and solid rocket boosters (known as a boilerplate configuration) and tested in a launch configuration at Kennedy Space Center Launch Pad 39A.

Retirement

With the completion of critical testing, Enterprise was partially disassembled to allow certain components to be reused in other shuttles, then underwent an international tour visiting France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, Canada, and the U.S. states of California, Alabama, and Louisiana (during the 1984 Louisiana World Exposition). It was also used to fit-check the never-used shuttle launch pad at Vandenberg AFB, California. Finally, on November 18, 1985, Enterprise was ferried to Washington, D.C., where it became property of the Smithsonian Institution.

Post-Challenger

After the Challenger disaster, NASA considered using Enterprise as a replacement. However refitting the shuttle with all of the necessary equipment needed for it to be used in space was considered, but instead it was decided to use spares constructed at the same time as Discovery and Atlantis to build Endeavour.

Post-Columbia

In 2003, after the breakup of Columbia during re-entry, the Columbia Accident Investigation Board conducted tests at Southwest Research Institute, which used an air gun to shoot foam blocks of similar size, mass and speed to that which struck Columbia at a test structure which mechanically replicated the orbiter wing leading edge. They removed a fiberglass panel from Enterprise’s wing to perform analysis of the material and attached it to the test structure, then shot a foam block at it. While the panel was not broken as a result of the test, the impact was enough to permanently deform a seal. As the reinforced carbon-carbon (RCC) panel on Columbia was 2.5 times weaker, this suggested that the RCC leading edge would have been shattered. Additional tests on the fiberglass were canceled in order not to risk damaging the test apparatus, and a panel from Discovery was tested to determine the effects of the foam on a similarly-aged RCC leading edge. On July 7, 2003, a foam impact test created a hole 41 cm by 42.5 cm (16.1 inches by 16.7 inches) in the protective RCC panel. The tests clearly demonstrated that a foam impact of the type Columbia sustained could seriously breach the protective RCC panels on the wing leading edge.

The board determined that the probable cause of the accident was that the foam impact caused a breach of a reinforced carbon-carbon panel along the leading edge of Columbia’s left wing, allowing hot gases generated during re-entry to enter the wing and cause structural collapse. This caused Columbia to spin out of control, breaking up with the loss of the entire crew.

Museum exhibit

Enterprise was stored at the Smithsonian’s hangar at Washington Dulles International Airport before it was restored and moved to the newly built Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum‘s Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center at Dulles International Airport, where it has been the centerpiece of the space collection. On April 12, 2011, NASA announced that Space Shuttle Discovery, the most traveled orbiter in the fleet, will be added to the collection once the Shuttle fleet is retired. When that happens, Enterprise will be moved to the Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum in New York City, to a newly constructed hangar adjacent to the museum. In preparation for the anticipated relocation, engineers evaluated the vehicle in early 2010 and determined that it was safe to fly on the Shuttle Carrier Aircraft once again.

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center: Vought F4U-1D Corsair

Image by Chris Devers
See more photos of this, and the Wikipedia article.

Details, quoting from Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum | Vought F4U-1D Corsair:

By V-J Day, September 2, 1945, Corsair pilots had amassed an 11:1 kill ratio against enemy aircraft. The aircraft’s distinctive inverted gull-wing design allowed ground clearance for the huge, three-bladed Hamilton Standard Hydromatic propeller, which spanned more than 4 meters (13 feet). The Pratt and Whitney R-2800 radial engine and Hydromatic propeller was the largest and one of the most powerful engine-propeller combinations ever flown on a fighter aircraft.

Charles Lindbergh flew bombing missions in a Corsair with Marine Air Group 31 against Japanese strongholds in the Pacific in 1944. This airplane is painted in the colors and markings of the Corsair Sun Setter, a Marine close-support fighter assigned to the USS Essex in July 1944.

Transferred from the United States Navy.

Manufacturer:
Vought Aircraft Company

Date:
1940

Country of Origin:
United States of America

Dimensions:
Overall: 460 x 1020cm, 4037kg, 1250cm (15ft 1 1/8in. x 33ft 5 9/16in., 8900lb., 41ft 1/8in.)

Materials:
All metal with fabric-covered wings behind the main spar.

Physical Description:
R-2800 radial air-cooled engine with 1,850 horsepower, turned a three-blade Hamilton Standard Hydromatic propeller with solid aluminum blades spanning 13 feet 1 inch; wing bent gull-shaped on both sides of the fuselage.

Long Description:
On February 1, 1938, the United States Navy Bureau of Aeronautics requested proposals from American aircraft manufacturers for a new carrier-based fighter airplane. During April, the Vought Aircraft Corporation responded with two designs and one of them, powered by a Pratt & Whitney R-2800 engine, won the competition in June. Less than a year later, Vought test pilot Lyman A. Bullard, Jr., first flew the Vought XF4U-1 prototype on May 29, 1940. At that time, the largest engine driving the biggest propeller ever flown on a fighter aircraft propelled Bullard on this test flight. The R-2800 radial air-cooled engine developed 1,850 horsepower and it turned a three-blade Hamilton Standard Hydromatic propeller with solid aluminum blades spanning 13 feet 1 inch.

The airplane Bullard flew also had another striking feature, a wing bent gull-shaped on both sides of the fuselage. This arrangement gave additional ground clearance for the propeller and reduced drag at the wing-to-fuselage joint. Ironically for a 644-kph (400 mph) airplane, Vought covered the wing with fabric behind the main spar, a practice the company also followed on the OS2U Kingfisher (see NASM collection).

When naval air strategists had crafted the requirements for the new fighter, the need for speed had overridden all other performance goals. With this in mind, the Bureau of Aeronautics selected the most powerful air-cooled engine available, the R-2800. Vought assembled a team, lead by chief designer Rex Biesel, to design the best airframe around this powerful engine. The group included project engineer Frank Albright, aerodynamics engineer Paul Baker, and propulsion engineer James Shoemaker. Biesel and his team succeeded in building a very fast fighter but when they redesigned the prototype for production, they were forced to make an unfortunate compromise.

The Navy requested heavier armament for production Corsairs and Biesel redesigned each outboard folding wing panel to carry three .50 caliber machine guns. These guns displaced fuel tanks installed in each wing leading edge. To replace this lost capacity, an 897-liter (237 gal) fuselage tank was installed between the cockpit and the engine. To maintain the speedy and narrow fuselage profile, Biesel could not stack the cockpit on top of the tank, so he moved it nearly three feet aft. Now the wing completely blocked the pilot’s line of sight during the most critical stages of landing. The early Corsair also had a vicious stall, powerful torque and propeller effects at slow speed, a short tail wheel strut, main gear struts that often bounced the airplane at touchdown, and cowl flap actuators that leaked oil onto the windshield. These difficulties, combined with the lack of cockpit visibility, made the airplane nearly impossible to land on the tiny deck of an aircraft carrier. Navy pilots soon nicknamed the F4U the ‘ensign eliminator’ for its tendency to kill these inexperienced aviators. The Navy refused to clear the F4U for carrier operations until late in 1944, more than seven years after the project started.

This flaw did not deter the Navy from accepting Corsairs because Navy and Marine pilots sorely needed an improved fighter to replace the Grumman F4F Wildcat (see NASM collection). By New Year’s Eve, 1942, the service owned 178 F4U-1 airplanes. Early in 1943, the Navy decided to divert all Corsairs to land-based United States Marine Corps squadrons and fill Navy carrier-based units with the Grumman F6F Hellcat (see NASM collection). At its best speed of 612 kph (380 mph) at 6,992 m (23,000 ft), the Hellcat was about 24 kph (15 mph) slower than the Corsair but it was a joy to fly aboard the carrier. The F6F filled in splendidly until improvements to the F4U qualified it for carrier operations. Meanwhile, the Marines on Guadalcanal took their Corsairs into combat and engaged the enemy for the first time on February 14, 1943, six months before Hellcat pilots on that battle-scared island first encountered enemy aircraft.

The F4U had an immediate impact on the Pacific air war. Pilots could use the Corsair’s speed and firepower to engage the more maneuverable Japanese airplanes only when the advantage favored the Americans. Unprotected by armor or self-sealing fuel tanks, no Japanese fighter or bomber could withstand for more than a few seconds the concentrated volley from the six .50 caliber machine guns carried by a Corsair. Major Gregory "Pappy" Boyington assumed command of Marine Corsair squadron VMF-214, nicknamed the ‘Black Sheep’ squadron, on September 7, 1943. During less than 5 months of action, Boyington received credit for downing 28 enemy aircraft. Enemy aircraft shot him down on January 3, 1944, but he survived the war in a Japanese prison camp.

In May and June 1944, Charles A. Lindbergh flew Corsair missions with Marine pilots at Green Island and Emirau. On September 3, 1944, Lindbergh demonstrated the F4U’s bomb hauling capacity by flying a Corsair from Marine Air Group 31 carrying three bombs each weighing 450 kg (1,000 lb). He dropped this load on enemy positions at Wotje Atoll. On the September 8, Lindbergh dropped the first 900-kg (2,000 lb) bomb during an attack on the atoll. For the finale five days later, the Atlantic flyer delivered a 900-kg (2,000 lb) bomb and two 450-kg (1,000 lb) bombs. Lindbergh went ahead and flew these missions after the commander of MAG-31 informed him that if he was forced down and captured, the Japanese would almost certainly execute him.

As of V-J Day, September 2, 1945, the Navy credited Corsair pilots with destroying 2,140 enemy aircraft in aerial combat. The Navy and Marines lost 189 F4Us in combat and 1,435 Corsairs in non-combat accidents. Beginning on February 13, 1942, Marine and Navy pilots flew 64,051 operational sorties, 54,470 from runways and 9,581 from carrier decks. During the war, the British Royal Navy accepted 2,012 Corsairs and the Royal New Zealand Air Force accepted 364. The demand was so great that the Goodyear Aircraft Corporation and the Brewster Aeronautical Corporation also produced the F4U.

Corsairs returned to Navy carrier decks and Marine airfields during the Korean War. On September 10, 1952, Captain Jesse Folmar of Marine Fighter Squadron VMF-312 destroyed a MiG-15 in aerial combat over the west coast of Korea. However, F4U pilots did not have many air-to-air encounters over Korea. Their primary mission was to support Allied ground units along the battlefront.

After the World War II, civilian pilots adapted the speedy bent-wing bird from Vought to fly in competitive air races. They preferred modified versions of the F2G-1 and -2 originally built by Goodyear. Corsairs won the prestigious Thompson Trophy twice. In 1952, Vought manufactured 94 F4U-7s for the French Navy, and these aircraft saw action over Indochina but this order marked the end of Corsair production. In production longer than any other U.S. fighter to see service in World War II, Vought, Goodyear, and Brewster built a total of 12,582 F4Us.

The United States Navy donated an F4U-1D to the National Air and Space Museum in September 1960. Vought delivered this Corsair, Bureau of Aeronautics serial number 50375, to the Navy on April 26, 1944. By October, pilots of VF-10 were flying it but in November, the airplane was transferred to VF-89 at Naval Air Station Atlantic City. It remained there as the squadron moved to NAS Oceana and NAS Norfolk. During February 1945, the Navy withdrew the airplane from active service and transferred it to a pool of surplus aircraft stored at Quantico, Virginia. In 1980, NASM craftsmen restored the F4U-1D in the colors and markings of a Corsair named "Sun Setter," a fighter assigned to Marine Fighter Squadron VMF-114 when that unit served aboard the "USS Essex" in July 1944.

• • •

Quoting from Wikipedia | Vought F4U Corsair:

The Chance Vought F4U Corsair was a carrier-capable fighter aircraft that saw service primarily in World War II and the Korean War. Demand for the aircraft soon overwhelmed Vought’s manufacturing capability, resulting in production by Goodyear and Brewster: Goodyear-built Corsairs were designated FG and Brewster-built aircraft F3A. From the first prototype delivery to the U.S. Navy in 1940, to final delivery in 1953 to the French, 12,571 F4U Corsairs were manufactured by Vought, in 16 separate models, in the longest production run of any piston-engined fighter in U.S. history (1942–1953).

The Corsair served in the U.S. Navy, U.S. Marines, Fleet Air Arm and the Royal New Zealand Air Force, as well as the French Navy Aeronavale and other, smaller, air forces until the 1960s. It quickly became the most capable carrier-based fighter-bomber of World War II. Some Japanese pilots regarded it as the most formidable American fighter of World War II, and the U.S. Navy counted an 11:1 kill ratio with the F4U Corsair.

F4U-1D (Corsair Mk IV): Built in parallel with the F4U-1C, but was introduced in April 1944. It had the new -8W water-injection engine. This change gave the aircraft up to 250 hp (190 kW) more power, which, in turn, increased performance. Speed, for example, was boosted from 417 miles per hour (671 km/h) to 425 miles per hour (684 km/h). Because of the U.S. Navy’s need for fighter-bombers, it had a payload of rockets double the -1A’s, as well as twin-rack plumbing for an additional belly drop tank. Such modifications necessitated the need for rocket tabs (attached to fully metal-plated underwing surfaces) and bomb pylons to be bolted on the fighter, however, causing extra drag. Additionally, the role of fighter-bombing was a new task for the Corsair and the wing fuel cells proved too vulnerable and were removed.[] The extra fuel carried by the two drop tanks would still allow the aircraft to fly relatively long missions despite the heavy, un-aerodynamic load. The regular armament of six machine guns were implemented as well. The canopies of most -1Ds had their struts removed along with their metal caps, which were used — at one point — as a measure to prevent the canopies’ glass from cracking as they moved along the fuselage spines of the fighters.[] Also, the clear-view style "Malcolm Hood" canopy used initially on Supermarine Spitfire and P-51C Mustang aircraft was adopted as standard equipment for the -1D model, and all later F4U production aircraft. Additional production was carried out by Goodyear (FG-1D) and Brewster (F3A-1D). In Fleet Air Arm service, the latter was known as the Corsair III, and both had their wingtips clipped by 8" per wing to allow storage in the lower hangars of British carriers.

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center: Space Shuttle Enterprise (starboard view)

Image by Chris Devers

See more photos of this, and the Wikipedia article.

Details, quoting from Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum | Space Shuttle Enterprise:

Manufacturer:
Rockwell International Corporation

Country of Origin:
United States of America

Dimensions:
Overall: 57 ft. tall x 122 ft. long x 78 ft. wing span, 150,000 lb.
(1737.36 x 3718.57 x 2377.44cm, 68039.6kg)

Materials:
Aluminum airframe and body with some fiberglass features; payload bay doors are graphite epoxy composite; thermal tiles are simulated (polyurethane foam) except for test samples of actual tiles and thermal blankets.

The first Space Shuttle orbiter, "Enterprise," is a full-scale test vehicle used for flights in the atmosphere and tests on the ground; it is not equipped for spaceflight. Although the airframe and flight control elements are like those of the Shuttles flown in space, this vehicle has no propulsion system and only simulated thermal tiles because these features were not needed for atmospheric and ground tests. "Enterprise" was rolled out at Rockwell International’s assembly facility in Palmdale, California, in 1976. In 1977, it entered service for a nine-month-long approach-and-landing test flight program. Thereafter it was used for vibration tests and fit checks at NASA centers, and it also appeared in the 1983 Paris Air Show and the 1984 World’s Fair in New Orleans. In 1985, NASA transferred "Enterprise" to the Smithsonian Institution’s National Air and Space Museum.

Transferred from National Aeronautics and Space Administration

• • •

Quoting from Wikipedia | Space Shuttle Enterprise:

The Space Shuttle Enterprise (NASA Orbiter Vehicle Designation: OV-101) was the first Space Shuttle orbiter. It was built for NASA as part of the Space Shuttle program to perform test flights in the atmosphere. It was constructed without engines or a functional heat shield, and was therefore not capable of spaceflight.

Originally, Enterprise had been intended to be refitted for orbital flight, which would have made it the second space shuttle to fly after Columbia. However, during the construction of Columbia, details of the final design changed, particularly with regard to the weight of the fuselage and wings. Refitting Enterprise for spaceflight would have involved dismantling the orbiter and returning the sections to subcontractors across the country. As this was an expensive proposition, it was determined to be less costly to build Challenger around a body frame (STA-099) that had been created as a test article. Similarly, Enterprise was considered for refit to replace Challenger after the latter was destroyed, but Endeavour was built from structural spares instead.

Service

Construction began on the first orbiter on June 4, 1974. Designated OV-101, it was originally planned to be named Constitution and unveiled on Constitution Day, September 17, 1976. A write-in campaign by Trekkies to President Gerald Ford asked that the orbiter be named after the Starship Enterprise, featured on the television show Star Trek. Although Ford did not mention the campaign, the president—who during World War II had served on the aircraft carrier USS Monterey (CVL-26) that served with USS Enterprise (CV-6)—said that he was "partial to the name" and overrode NASA officials.

The design of OV-101 was not the same as that planned for OV-102, the first flight model; the tail was constructed differently, and it did not have the interfaces to mount OMS pods. A large number of subsystems—ranging from main engines to radar equipment—were not installed on this vehicle, but the capacity to add them in the future was retained. Instead of a thermal protection system, its surface was primarily fiberglass.

In mid-1976, the orbiter was used for ground vibration tests, allowing engineers to compare data from an actual flight vehicle with theoretical models.

On September 17, 1976, Enterprise was rolled out of Rockwell’s plant at Palmdale, California. In recognition of its fictional namesake, Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry and most of the principal cast of the original series of Star Trek were on hand at the dedication ceremony.

Approach and landing tests (ALT)

Main article: Approach and Landing Tests

On January 31, 1977, it was taken by road to Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards Air Force Base, to begin operational testing.

While at NASA Dryden, Enterprise was used by NASA for a variety of ground and flight tests intended to validate aspects of the shuttle program. The initial nine-month testing period was referred to by the acronym ALT, for "Approach and Landing Test". These tests included a maiden "flight" on February 18, 1977 atop a Boeing 747 Shuttle Carrier Aircraft (SCA) to measure structural loads and ground handling and braking characteristics of the mated system. Ground tests of all orbiter subsystems were carried out to verify functionality prior to atmospheric flight.

The mated Enterprise/SCA combination was then subjected to five test flights with Enterprise unmanned and unactivated. The purpose of these test flights was to measure the flight characteristics of the mated combination. These tests were followed with three test flights with Enterprise manned to test the shuttle flight control systems.

Enterprise underwent five free flights where the craft separated from the SCA and was landed under astronaut control. These tests verified the flight characteristics of the orbiter design and were carried out under several aerodynamic and weight configurations. On the fifth and final glider flight, pilot-induced oscillation problems were revealed, which had to be addressed before the first orbital launch occurred.

On August 12, 1977, the space shuttle Enterprise flew on its own for the first time.

Preparation for STS-1

Following the ALT program, Enterprise was ferried among several NASA facilities to configure the craft for vibration testing. In June 1979, it was mated with an external tank and solid rocket boosters (known as a boilerplate configuration) and tested in a launch configuration at Kennedy Space Center Launch Pad 39A.

Retirement

With the completion of critical testing, Enterprise was partially disassembled to allow certain components to be reused in other shuttles, then underwent an international tour visiting France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, Canada, and the U.S. states of California, Alabama, and Louisiana (during the 1984 Louisiana World Exposition). It was also used to fit-check the never-used shuttle launch pad at Vandenberg AFB, California. Finally, on November 18, 1985, Enterprise was ferried to Washington, D.C., where it became property of the Smithsonian Institution.

Post-Challenger

After the Challenger disaster, NASA considered using Enterprise as a replacement. However refitting the shuttle with all of the necessary equipment needed for it to be used in space was considered, but instead it was decided to use spares constructed at the same time as Discovery and Atlantis to build Endeavour.

Post-Columbia

In 2003, after the breakup of Columbia during re-entry, the Columbia Accident Investigation Board conducted tests at Southwest Research Institute, which used an air gun to shoot foam blocks of similar size, mass and speed to that which struck Columbia at a test structure which mechanically replicated the orbiter wing leading edge. They removed a fiberglass panel from Enterprise’s wing to perform analysis of the material and attached it to the test structure, then shot a foam block at it. While the panel was not broken as a result of the test, the impact was enough to permanently deform a seal. As the reinforced carbon-carbon (RCC) panel on Columbia was 2.5 times weaker, this suggested that the RCC leading edge would have been shattered. Additional tests on the fiberglass were canceled in order not to risk damaging the test apparatus, and a panel from Discovery was tested to determine the effects of the foam on a similarly-aged RCC leading edge. On July 7, 2003, a foam impact test created a hole 41 cm by 42.5 cm (16.1 inches by 16.7 inches) in the protective RCC panel. The tests clearly demonstrated that a foam impact of the type Columbia sustained could seriously breach the protective RCC panels on the wing leading edge.

The board determined that the probable cause of the accident was that the foam impact caused a breach of a reinforced carbon-carbon panel along the leading edge of Columbia’s left wing, allowing hot gases generated during re-entry to enter the wing and cause structural collapse. This caused Columbia to spin out of control, breaking up with the loss of the entire crew.

Museum exhibit

Enterprise was stored at the Smithsonian’s hangar at Washington Dulles International Airport before it was restored and moved to the newly built Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum‘s Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center at Dulles International Airport, where it has been the centerpiece of the space collection. On April 12, 2011, NASA announced that Space Shuttle Discovery, the most traveled orbiter in the fleet, will be added to the collection once the Shuttle fleet is retired. When that happens, Enterprise will be moved to the Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum in New York City, to a newly constructed hangar adjacent to the museum. In preparation for the anticipated relocation, engineers evaluated the vehicle in early 2010 and determined that it was safe to fly on the Shuttle Carrier Aircraft once again.

Nice Machine Components Makers photos

A couple of nice machine parts companies pictures I identified:

Image from page 90 of “The Crossley Machine Co. (Incorporated), producers of clay working machinery : pottery, electric porcelain, tile making, clay washing and crucible machinery.” (1918)

Image by Net Archive Book Images
Identifier: crossleymachinec00cros
Title: The Crossley Machine Co. (Incorporated), manufacturers of clay operating machinery : pottery, electric porcelain, tile generating, clay washing and crucible machinery.
Year: 1918 (1910s)
Authors: Crossley Machine Co.
Subjects: Crossley Machine Co.–Catalogs. Clay industries–Gear and supplies–Catalogs.
Publisher: Trenton, N.J. : Crossley Machine Co.
Contributing Library: Rutgers University Libraries
Digitizing Sponsor: Lyrasis Members and Sloan Foundation

View Book Web page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Pictures From Book

Click right here to view book on-line to see this illustration in context in a browseable on the internet version of this book.

Text Appearing Just before Image:
Parts CARRIED IN STOCK.Made IN TWO SIZES ONLY, A and B two c7) Weigh! ExportWeight Size of Getting and Size ofDischarge Pipes Brass Valve Pressure AB 95 lbs.one hundred lbs. 150 lbs.150 lbs. 2 in. two in. dia.2 in. 2H in. dia. 80 to 10080 to 100 TRENTON, NEW JERSEY 87 Over-Flow or Relief Valve

Text Appearing Soon after Image:
This security valve is specifically created forclay or heavy and gritty substances. The plungerand rings are created of brass with rubber seats. Itis utilized in connection with our clay pumps forregulating the stress of the liquid clay in thefilter presses. We make these safety valves in 3 sizes,of the following dimensions: Size Weight ExportWeight Size of Receiving andDischarge Pipes Variety ofPressure No. 1No. 2No. three 25 lbs.35 lbs.85 lbs. 50 lbs.one hundred lbs.150 lbs. K in. pipeIK in. pipe2 in. pipe 5 to 80 lbs.ten to 80 lbs.20 to 80 lbs. 88 THE CROSSLEY MACHINE CO. Hand Whirlers The hand whirlers shown on opposite web page are madewith the very best components and workmanship, and will hefound to be properly balanced and very easily revolved. The stepat bottom of spindle can be adjusted to let for anywear that may take place in the spindle. The bench whirler is fastened to a bench by meansof wood screws, which hold it perfectly rigid and allowit to function freely. The sagger makers whirler is, as its name implies,us

Note About Photos
Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page photos that may have been digitally enhanced for readability – coloration and look of these illustrations may possibly not perfectly resemble the original function.

Machine Space Cubicle

Image by tj.blackwell
This wooden compartment, its glass windows extended considering that smashed, lies adjacent to the main metalworking room of the Industrial Works mill. It appears to have been used as a type of functional admin area to shop plans for the machine components that have been at present in production on the lathes. It also includes a battered old telephone booth, which is the green object at the prime left of this image.

Ryan Johansen acquisition is a sign of good asset management

Ryan Johansen acquisition is a sign of very good asset management
The Predators have been in existence given that 1998. David Poile has been the basic manager from Day 1. Nashville has by no means won a Stanley Cup. Their fruitless quest has not changed Poile&#39s philosophy to group developing. The Northeastern graduate&nbsp…
Read much more on The Boston Globe

Schmitt Industries Announces Management Modifications
For the Balancer Segment, the Company styles, manufactures and sells pc-controlled vibration detection, balancing and approach manage systems for the worldwide machine tool industry, particularly for grinding machines. … a wide selection of …
Study a lot more on CNNMoney

12 amazing Irish healthcare device makers you need to have to know about
Founded in 2006 by Dr David Gillen, Blueacre aims to offer a committed, high-quality laser processing and consulting service. By means of continuous investment in study, improvement and engineering, the firm offers laser micromachining systems&nbsp…
Study far more on Siliconrepublic.com

Intuitive HMI Facilitates Grinder Manage

Intuitive HMI Facilitates Grinder Manage
The Landis centerless grinder&#39s axle workpiece and grinding wheel rotate in the same path, inducing smooth grinding as the plunge grinder pushes the wheel into the workpiece. In the mid-1990s, APeC replaced the hydraulic actuation of the plunge&nbsp…
Study a lot more on Machine Design

Centerless Grinding&#39s Hybrid Wheel Technologies
The centerless process is a somewhat overlooked, but extremely high customer of resin bond diamond wheels, traditionally employing very low technology grinders and crude grinding situations. G Ratio values have in the previous failed to exceed .015. In fact …
Read much more on Today’s Power Solutions

Lastest Grinding Centerless News

Obtaining to Know Glebar
Glebar was founded in 1952 by Miner Gleason (the “gle”) and Robert Barhorst (the “bar”) as a manufacturer of centerless plunge-grinding machines. In the 1960s, it adapted its plunge grinding technologies to form billiard balls and golf ball cores. (To …
Read much more on Modern Machine Shop (blog)

Magic Commence Extremely Important Five-Game Road Trip
Skiles is the ultimate “one game at a time&#39&#39 type of coach, but he also sees great worth in taking specific segments of the season and grouping them collectively for rallying points throughout the 82-game grind. For instance, Skiles not too long ago took to calling the …
Study a lot more on OrlandoMagic.com